quinta-feira, abril 14, 2005

Newsletter de Abril 2005 da Mediate.com

Mediate.com's Conflict Resolution Newsletter
April 13, 2005 #137

Novos artigos sobre mediação da "Mediate.com". Esta é uma selecção, possível, daaqueles cuja temática tem para nós actualidade. Os estilos do mediador e como escolher o mediador adequado (segundo o seu estilo) consoante o tipo de conflito.
Outro dos artigos que chamou a nossa atenção fala sobre o impacto que a focalização da mediação nos aspectos legais pode ter no seu resultado final.

The Who Of Mediation-Part I: A New Look at Mediator “Styles”
by Paula Young
In1994, Len Riskin, the C.A. Leedy Professor of Law at the University of Missouri-Columbia and Director of its Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, inadvertently started a great debate about what “style” of mediation was “best.”

The Who of Mediation - Part II: Wisely Choosing a Mediator
by Paula M. Young
Just about anyone can hang up a shingle advertising his or her ability to conduct private mediations. For lawyers and clients and other mediation parties, this information should tell you that the “buyer [must] beware.” You need to take the time to choose your mediator wisely and with care. Mediators vary greatly in skill, training, experience, and temperament. Parties choosing a mediator must approach the task on a case-by-case basis, considering the facts, emotions, relationships, and law of the dispute as they may affect the attributes you need in mediator.

Sidestepping Impasse: The Essence Of Mediation
by Norman R. Page
Impasse--also referred to as stalemate, deadlock, or getting stuck--occurs for a variety of reasons, but primarily it occurs when the parties are unwilling or unable to identify options and make concessions to each other. This article will review nine precursors of impasse and offer advice to mediators on how to deal with each.

Over Emphasis Of Legal Issues In Mediation May Be Detrimental To Settlement
by Jon Linden
This article attempts to incisively examine why certain processes might fail because of an over emphasis on the legal aspects of the case.

Sem comentários: